1800 4 LOGIC (1800 456 442) |
CASE LAW - SAFE SYSTEM OF WORK FOR FORKLIFT LOADERS |
|
Failure to provide safe system of work for forklift loaders ... The Case WorkSafe Victoria v AGFAB Engineering (Vic) Pty Ltd (2017) |
On April 2015, AGFAB Engineering Pty Ltd (the Company) – a general engineering, electrical, maintenance and project management company – was concluding work at a client’s site in Port Melbourne. Three of the Company’s workers unsuccessfully attempted to load a forklift onto the back of a tilt tray truck. The fourth member of the Company’s crew – the supervisor – was attending to another area of the workplace. The first worker drove the forklift onto the inclined tray, holding down the throttle as far as it would go, while the second pushed the forklift from behind and the third levelled off the tray. However, the forklift rolled back off the truck and the first two workers jumped to safety, with all avoiding injury. The workers did not use the winch in the truck’s tray, which was obscured by other equipment. The Verdict The Court head evidence that all four workers had signed a safe work method statement (SWMS), which was in place for the task of loading the truck at the end of the day. However, the SWMS did not state that:
A separate, pre-incident risk assessment document contemplated these
risk controls, but only the supervisor, who was absent during the
incident, was aware of it. The Court found that the Company failed to
provide a safe system of work for its workers. The Company pleaded
guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of $25,000 and costs of %15,501.
No conviction was recorded.
|
This article is © 2015 Portner Press Pty Ltd and has been reproduced with permission of Portner Press, Australia. It was first published in the Health & Safety Handbook | close window |
formally OHS Logic Pty Ltd |
SYDNEY | CENTRAL COAST
| NEWCASTLE telephone 1800 4 LOGIC (1800 456 442) |
© Logic Business Resources Pty Ltd 2012 |